|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
197
|
Posted - 2015.11.21 22:50:43 -
[1] - Quote
Love this change. Gives a purpose for hics in lowsec and helps combat the "RUN AWAY" meta. If you see a hic and make the decision to engage you'd better be committed. Far too many bc's running around lowsec with mjd and fit to kill/neut anything fast enough to get inside normal scram range. Its not remotely op, its a new tactical tool for fighting against risk adverse enemies thats still far too expensive for most gangs to risk in large numbers.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
197
|
Posted - 2015.11.21 23:35:17 -
[2] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:Love this change. Gives a purpose for hics in lowsec and helps combat the "RUN AWAY" meta. If you see a hic and make the decision to engage you'd better be committed. Far too many bc's running around lowsec with mjd and fit to kill/neut anything fast enough to get inside normal scram range. Its not remotely op, its a new tactical tool for fighting against risk adverse enemies thats still far too expensive for most gangs to risk in large numbers. You must be the first person I've heard complaining about the dominance of BC's in low sec. *chuckles*
Its not dominance, its annoyance. A properly fit and flown bc can be very hard to catch without shipping into a gang specifically fit for the purpose. Lately we just ignore most bc's we see on dscan because you know he's gonna be mjd anti-frig fit. Sneaking a hic on top of them from just outside dscan range will be a nice potential counter.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
197
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 00:05:43 -
[3] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:Love this change. Gives a purpose for hics in lowsec and helps combat the "RUN AWAY" meta. If you see a hic and make the decision to engage you'd better be committed. Far too many bc's running around lowsec with mjd and fit to kill/neut anything fast enough to get inside normal scram range. Its not remotely op, its a new tactical tool for fighting against risk adverse enemies thats still far too expensive for most gangs to risk in large numbers. You must be the first person I've heard complaining about the dominance of BC's in low sec. *chuckles* Its not dominance, its annoyance. A properly fit and flown bc can be very hard to catch without shipping into a gang specifically fit for the purpose (ussually with ewar.) Lately we just ignore most bc's we see on dscan because you know he's gonna be mjd anti-frig fit. Sneaking a hic on top of them from just outside dscan range will be a nice potential counter. So you are flying in frigate gangs and you complain that BCs are an annoyance. Why should a BC not have some defence against a frigate gang. And it is relatively easy to counter that defence, fit a small nos to counter his neut, and use your signature to avoid his DPS. Unless you are complaining that your kitey frigate gang cannot engage him risk free with a long point without him MJDing away, in which case I have even less sympathy. Is this thread about hics or is it just a place for you to try and argue something you clearly dont have a clue about.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
197
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 00:37:22 -
[4] - Quote
Your counters are misguided. If it were that easy it wouldnt be an issue and your still missing the point. Its not about struggling its about a class/fit that needs a more appropriate counter. Hics are designed to catch things. This change makes them viable at doing so in lowsec. Back on the subject of the actual thread, anything that forces ppl to actually stay and fight is a good thing.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
197
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 01:11:46 -
[5] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:Your counters are misguided. If it were that easy it wouldnt be an issue and your still missing the point. Its not about struggling its about a class/fit that needs a more appropriate counter. Hics are designed to catch things. This change makes them viable at doing so in lowsec. Back on the subject of the actual thread, anything that forces ppl to actually stay and fight is a good thing. My counters are tried and tested, and I never said it was easy, but then it shouldn't be fighting a BC in a frigate. But no matter, I am happy if you overlook this as it means more easy targets who don't fully understand the PvP mechanics. But anyway to the point of the thread, as for forcing people to stay and fight, what will actually happen as pointed out and as evidenced from tests on Singularity is that the HIC will kite you at range relatively risk free until either he kills you or backup arrives. Then your counters are tried and tested against poorly fitted bc's for the job. Keeping you held down until others can get on target is kinda the point. Interceptors, interdictors and hics all serve that specific purpose.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
199
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 01:39:31 -
[6] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:Your counters are misguided. If it were that easy it wouldnt be an issue and your still missing the point. Its not about struggling its about a class/fit that needs a more appropriate counter. Hics are designed to catch things. This change makes them viable at doing so in lowsec. Back on the subject of the actual thread, anything that forces ppl to actually stay and fight is a good thing. My counters are tried and tested, and I never said it was easy, but then it shouldn't be fighting a BC in a frigate. But no matter, I am happy if you overlook this as it means more easy targets who don't fully understand the PvP mechanics. But anyway to the point of the thread, as for forcing people to stay and fight, what will actually happen as pointed out and as evidenced from tests on Singularity is that the HIC will kite you at range relatively risk free until either he kills you or backup arrives. Then your counters are tried and tested against poorly fitted bc's for the job. Keeping you held down until others can get on target is kinda the point. Interceptors, interdictors and hics all serve that specific purpose. I'll just say that a single svipul can very easily single handedly hold down any BC if you know what you are doing, the only real problem will be ECM. The same logic can easily be applied to a standard frigate although it is more risky. Like I said, BCs are very weak against smaller ships in the current meta. It is against cruisers and above where they start to become more useful. A single svipul in scram range will be double neuted, double webbed and dead or if its a 10mn fit will be forced off grid if it can do so before it hits zero cap. Just ask ole stitch there, he's been posting in this thread and enjoys flying bc's in lowsec to great effectiveness. In fact i have an onyx sitting in hanger that I mistakenly fit out months ago specifically to catch his bc's before realizing that the scripted disruptor doesnt shut down mjd's.
Just to reiterate, I'm not talking about standard fleet fit bc's. I'm talking about fits that are very specifically setup to blap the crap out of targets of opportunity and escape with little risk of getting held down long enough to die.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
199
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 02:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
You simply seem to fail to grasp the entire point and dont have experience with slippery fits. A fit isnt gimped when its doing precisely what its meant to do. I presume you are an alt because if you are even remotely trying to weigh in on the matter w 14 kills to your name your opinion certainly doesnt count for much.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
199
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 02:35:22 -
[8] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:You simply seem to fail to grasp the entire point and dont have experience with slippery fits. A fit isnt gimped when its doing precisely what its meant to do. I have actually fought and killed plenty of slippery fits, I wouldn't consider any BC to be very slippery. Try fighting a phantasm or nano nightmare with defensive webs and scram, or T3 with fuel catalyst and oversized AB and you'll see what a proper slippery fit is. BCs are one of the least capable classes of ship to be able to fit as you suggest. They don't get that much benefit from an oversized AB, and are natively slow, and generally lack midslots to fit defensive web and scrams especially if you fit MJD. Yes those fits are tough to fight, but there are plenty of counters, and that method of fighting is hardly limited to BCs, in fact BCs are particularly bad at it.
And a bc will achieve the same thing at a tiny fraction of the cost. A ship that can apply 700 dps to anything in web range (frigs included) and mjd out as soon as anything threatening lands on grid are a pita. Oversided abs are used on some fits but for the most part its just about letting your target come to you, nuking them off the field then hitting the mjd and jumping to a safe.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
200
|
Posted - 2015.11.23 00:03:28 -
[9] - Quote
Don't get me wrong stitch, it wasnt an insult. I was just noting that you used the slippery bc's to great effectiveness. As for our fits against you we always tried to bring scrams because we knew you had mjd, you just ussually killed the tackle before we could get the dps on field. Thats when I started bringing the ecm to keep the tackle safe. I have to say though we never have gangs of 10. I wish we did. More commonly we fly 4-5 and none of us have links. I'm also the only person in the group I fly with that flies ships other than Amarr. All my fleet mates are PIE loyalists and have strict rules about only flying golden fleet. I'm sure you dealt w ppl that did, but it wasnt us. Nothing but respect, at least you come looking for fights.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
200
|
Posted - 2015.11.23 15:59:09 -
[10] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:This change is not a requirement to catch the slippery BCs. Your gang's unwillingness to ship into something outside of amarr RP was the reason you struggled against my fits. The irony of Daemun's point is that this change won't actually have any affect whatsoever on 'true' slippery fits, in fact they will become much more dominant in the current meta as an oversized afterburner is not affected by the HIC long scram. Ships like your anti frigate BC which as you pointed out is relatively easy to counter will be replaced with ships such with oversized and bonused afterburners which are MUCH more difficult to counter. Although the truth is most people do not understand PvP mechanics well enough to use slippery fits and will probably just bring an 'easy mode' HIC with long scram and MWD.
You still just dont get it. The bc's are just one example. Obviously a hic isnt going to be the answer to every slippery ship that comes along, the point is it gives the hic an actual use in lowsec. As right now it has absolutely none. And lowsec is crawling with stabbed farmers, and a ship that can help stop them is a good thing. Personally I'd just prefer that ccp lock stealth bombers out of missions and lock anything with stabs out of plexes but I dont see that happening so a 100point scram will at least give us another tool to work with.
As for these things camping gates I'm not particularly concerned. The only ships at risk will be solo mjd bc mission farmers. A decent gate camp already has enough points and webs to make escape impossible so a hic doesnt change anything. It just means a single cruiser can keep you from activating your mjd from longer range until another ship w scram can get in range. Any decent gang will be sending a scout ahead so for normal groups it doesnt have any impact.
Theres nothing about your fit that serves to counter risk adverse gains stitch. A risk adverse pilot doesnt try to kill a bc w a frigate, they upship to archons. Lol.... I laugh but its true. All your fit does is serve as bait for wt's that have the nerve to go after any enemy they can find and then try to pick off the smaller ships while trying to preserve your chance at escape. Any time we brought out a bc you simply left field and warped to a safe. If you really wanted to catch "risk adverse kiters" you be in a solo frig catching kiters. You get props for coming after fights and forcing us to counter your specific fit but in the end its still a bait ship that relies on unwary targets charging in on you unaware of your fit.
Daemun of Khanid
|
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
200
|
Posted - 2015.11.23 19:18:20 -
[11] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:
As for these things camping gates I'm not particularly concerned. The only ships at risk will be solo mjd bc mission farmers. A decent gate camp already has enough points and webs to make escape impossible so a hic doesnt change anything. It just means a single cruiser can keep you from activating your mjd from longer range until another ship w scram can get in range. Any decent gang will be sending a scout ahead so for normal groups it doesnt have any impact.
Theres nothing about your fit that serves to counter risk adverse gains stitch. A risk adverse pilot doesnt try to kill a bc w a frigate, they upship to archons. Lol.... I laugh but its true. All your fit does is serve as bait for wt's that have the nerve to go after any enemy they can find and then try to pick off the smaller ships while trying to preserve your chance at escape. Any time we brought out a bc you simply left field and warped to a safe. If you really wanted to catch "risk adverse kiters" you be in a solo frig catching kiters. You get props for coming after fights and forcing us to counter your specific fit but in the end its still a bait ship that relies on unwary targets charging in on you unaware of your fit.
I think you are vastly underestimating what groups will do with these HICs. A linked proteus/lachesis (with all skills at 5) with pimp scram will be around 27km IIRC. A HIC with a t1 WDFG and HIC4 will be 28-29km. A sebod HIC with a gang could easily catch frigs/cruisers. This wont affect ONLY BCs, but anything that isnt an inty or cloaky. I could dodge gate camps fairly easily in my BC. Activate MJD immediately on decloak and OH mwd away from gang and in most cases all their points and long webs meant nothing. Ive even done this to WT camps. Ive also never seen mission BCs, only stealth bombers. My fit doesnt directly counter risk averse gangs. It forces them to come into scram range if they want a kill. Now itll be nomens and HICs. So instead of actually committing to a fight, you will still continue flying kitey gangs, but bring a HIC along so you dont have to commit. Again, being risk averse. You would bring a BC, but again there would be 5-10 guys (maybe not all your corp, but part of the fleet) and a falcon with that "1 BC". As mentioned previously, you'll have to forgive me if i dont just offer myself as a free kill to a gang that outnumbers me, has EWAR and might be using links. You could have had 2-3 scram frigs with webs and once they landed, warped a BC on top. Or a navy aug. Which you guys used against me at one point which actually killed me with cause it was a tanky SOB with a scram. Having a 30km+ scram does nothing but reinforce risk averse kitey meta. Especially against larger ships. The MJD "slippery BC" was meant to bring ships in to brawl which is what BCs are good at. At the same time giving me the option to MJD away from all the cancerous garmurs/orthrus that were around. There is nothing worse than being plinked away by 150dps for 3min in a BC with no way to counter.
You forget to mention that you also sit at long range (100-150k) off beacon in large plexes in a safed direction so that anything like the tanky maller or prophecy cant get to you before you can escape. Which is why we had to start using mwd scram frigates with rook support. A hic with long scram means we have a chance of landing a larger ship on grid and tackle you before you can escape without having to use a speedy frig with ecm for defense.
How does a hic reinforce a kite meta? If anything it counters a kite meta by giving you something to reach out and shut down kiters with.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
200
|
Posted - 2015.11.23 19:31:29 -
[12] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:You still just dont get it. The bc's are just one example. Which part of his fit is very easy to counter already without a HIC did you not understand? Stitch even says this himself, all you needed to do was bring a prophecy or harbinger if your amarr loyalist's and you would have destroyed him. Heck he didn't even have any cap defense so you could have just bought a curse, pilgrim or sentinel, once his cap is gone he cannot activate the MJD or much else. Seriously, BCs are not particularly powerful at the moment, and the MJD is just a small tool in the BC and BS arsenal that gives them a couple of get outs in edge scenarios such as kiting frigates, in a lot of situations it is useless and not worth the mid slot. It is hardly the all powerful module that requires a direct hard counter. The whole gist of the argument has been that this will adversely affect BSs and BCs, all the other stuff you mentioned is irrelevant to the point which myself and others are pointing out, so it is not that we don't get it, it is that we are looking at it from a different angle. The kind of ships that deserve more to be hit are the type of kitey frigates that you fly and they will also be hit hard by the HIC long scram. If you think taking on a BC is difficult wait until your gang goes against one of these HIC's. Again you probably will claim we are being stupid and don't know what we are talking about without changing your blinkered mindset. Your too fixated on your frigates and not looking at the wider picture here. Daemun Khanid wrote: the point is it gives the hic an actual use in lowsec. I can agree with you here, the HIC needs some changes, but the point about the 37.5km scram and turning into a solo monster is where we disagree.
Again, you don't understand the situation and throw out counters that are not effective. As I mentioned in the previous post, a BC can position himself so that large ships that would be an effective counter (like the curse) cannot reach him before he can escape. Hence the need for fast tackle frigates... but it's pointless trying to explain it to you because you think that developing a counter is as easy as EFT. Tactics are the bigger challenge and a long scram hic will provide a new tool as a tactical counter. Will it be super dangerous for kitey frigs? Absolutely, and I'm all for that. Not only does it provide a tool for controlling the Kite meta it also provides a tool that can be used in the place of the previously used kite ships. I personally HATE that speed is essentially king, but it quite simply is, and something like a long range scram to counter that trend is a step in the right direction imo. The whole oversized AB fit is an issue unto itself and I would REALLY like to see CCP limit prop mods to the appropriate ship classes. There are numerous situations where a oversized ab fit ship simply cannot be beat/held down for the kill in even odds.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
200
|
Posted - 2015.11.29 17:53:40 -
[13] - Quote
All debate about whether the scram range is a good thing or not(I still think it is) how about a mwd penalty? Say 80% reduction in mwd speed bonus to the script. That would reduce a mwd fit Hic to ab speeds when the scripted disruptor is active allowing it to at least keep up w mwd fit ships that it has scrammed while preventing it from being a mega kite fit against ab or mwd fit ships. Should allow the long scram to function as an effective tactical tool without making the ship rediculously difficult to catch. If the med speed penalty stacks then it would also effectively imobilize fits that attempt to use multiple disruption fields in the high slots to keep entire fleets locked down.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Sanctus Imperialis
200
|
Posted - 2015.11.30 01:40:03 -
[14] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Daemun Khanid wrote:All debate about whether the scram range is a good thing or not aside (I still think it is) how about a mwd penalty? It is good to see you have come around in the end Daemun. This is pretty much what I suggested needed to be implemented a couple of pages back. Moac Tor wrote:Or keep the scram range but make it so that the HIC cannot activate a propulsion module with it active. That would still be a heavy nerf to kitey ships without it negatively impacting everything else. I'd be happy with an 80% speed nerf also. The main thing to me is that the HIC doesn't turn into a solo kitey ship but at the same time maintaining its role as an excellent primary tackling ship.
I wouldnt really call it coming around :). I still think that reducing the range of the scram with a second script is the wrong way to go. An interdictor should be able to do its job and stop things from running. That doesnt mean it should become an un-catchable kite in the progress but it also needs to be able to reasonably keep up or its just too easily negated. I never meant to imply that it should. I'd need to look at the numbers more closely but a reduction in tank might even be a reasonable change with the new scram changes. Something in between hacs and recons if they are as some have said capable of exteme tanks while still maintaining other capabilities. Recons for example have powerful tools at their disposal and (generally, aside from bait tank fits) they take a hit against their ehp levels in relation to other T2 cruisers. Anyway, point being, i think the long scram is just too valuable of an asset to throw away for a class that is supposed to fill the role of stopping other ships and that other steps should instead be taken to ensure balance.
Daemun of Khanid
|

Daemun Khanid
Black Dragon CGLM
217
|
Posted - 2015.12.10 06:09:41 -
[15] - Quote
Bezdar22 wrote:this new hic change is really bad. the focus point can scam u from 30 k then the hic can still move ove 1.2 k with battleship tank while ur stuck and unable to move .whats the point of training recon class ships then . plz balance that
ECM, neuts (curse), damps. Problem solved
Daemun of Khanid
|
|
|
|